Laspalas
2011-02-24, 08:08
Hello all,
I would appreciate oppinions about this. I have basically an elastomer block. This block is precompressed (for instance in x direction) and then the static stiffness is evaluated in compression (additional displacement in x direction) or in shear (in xy plane). To simulate this I have adjusted an hyperelastic models with material test data (uniaxial, shear and volumentric). There predicted response in compressión is very good but the shear respones is underpredicted by a factor around 2 to 3.
I have tried different strain density functions with different combinations of test dada in the paramenters fitting. Even I have tryed a reverse engineering of the model parameters directly from the real component response, forgetting then the material characterisation. The response is always similar, I can not increase the stiffness in shear without changing also significantly the response in compression. I seams that the strain density functions are not able to catch the existing coupling between compression and shear. Simulations with different compresion preload levels give almost similar shear response when tests show a strong stiffening.
Any suggestion of how to improve shear behaviour prediction when precompression exists? Thanks.
I would appreciate oppinions about this. I have basically an elastomer block. This block is precompressed (for instance in x direction) and then the static stiffness is evaluated in compression (additional displacement in x direction) or in shear (in xy plane). To simulate this I have adjusted an hyperelastic models with material test data (uniaxial, shear and volumentric). There predicted response in compressión is very good but the shear respones is underpredicted by a factor around 2 to 3.
I have tried different strain density functions with different combinations of test dada in the paramenters fitting. Even I have tryed a reverse engineering of the model parameters directly from the real component response, forgetting then the material characterisation. The response is always similar, I can not increase the stiffness in shear without changing also significantly the response in compression. I seams that the strain density functions are not able to catch the existing coupling between compression and shear. Simulations with different compresion preload levels give almost similar shear response when tests show a strong stiffening.
Any suggestion of how to improve shear behaviour prediction when precompression exists? Thanks.