nepolean.r
2010-01-14, 14:28
Dear Professor Jorgen,
I am Nepolean. Doing my Masters in Univ of Cincinnati. (Mech - CAE)
This is the first time I am writing to the group, but constantly go thru all the emails which are very useful to learn many new things.
My research area has a major part in material model development.
Recently I started to learn writing VUMAT .
To start with , I wrote VUMAT for hyperelastic mooney rivlin model (compressible) and tested on single C3D8R element using ABAQUS 6.9.1
VUMAT is based on U tensor - since manual says better to use U instead of F. I tried using F also. The results were almost same - either using F or U.
I compared the results of VUMAT (using U) with the results of inbuilt abaqus mooney rivlin model.
- for uniaxial tension and compression loads, results were closely matching.
- for shear stress load (element bottom constrained and top right nodes has load in x direction)
VUMAT underpredicts von mises stress by almost 20 times and underpredicts other directional stresses by 10 to 15 times
- for combined load cases (tension + shear , compression + shear)
Only the vonmises stress results are closely matching, all other individual direction stresses are out of match.
- combined loading in 2D elements, overpredicts stress (mises + all directional) by 25% to 40 % and displacement results are closely matching
I have also attached the .for file for your reference
possible mistake I thought
-corotational system : does the final stress vector needs to be multiplied by R tensor ? from where can we get the R tensor
but the manual says, only if F is used, then stress needs to be rotated back
kindly give me any possible feedback
thanks a lot for your time and hoping for your possible help.
Nepolean
Grad Student
Univ of Cincinnati
I am Nepolean. Doing my Masters in Univ of Cincinnati. (Mech - CAE)
This is the first time I am writing to the group, but constantly go thru all the emails which are very useful to learn many new things.
My research area has a major part in material model development.
Recently I started to learn writing VUMAT .
To start with , I wrote VUMAT for hyperelastic mooney rivlin model (compressible) and tested on single C3D8R element using ABAQUS 6.9.1
VUMAT is based on U tensor - since manual says better to use U instead of F. I tried using F also. The results were almost same - either using F or U.
I compared the results of VUMAT (using U) with the results of inbuilt abaqus mooney rivlin model.
- for uniaxial tension and compression loads, results were closely matching.
- for shear stress load (element bottom constrained and top right nodes has load in x direction)
VUMAT underpredicts von mises stress by almost 20 times and underpredicts other directional stresses by 10 to 15 times
- for combined load cases (tension + shear , compression + shear)
Only the vonmises stress results are closely matching, all other individual direction stresses are out of match.
- combined loading in 2D elements, overpredicts stress (mises + all directional) by 25% to 40 % and displacement results are closely matching
I have also attached the .for file for your reference
possible mistake I thought
-corotational system : does the final stress vector needs to be multiplied by R tensor ? from where can we get the R tensor
but the manual says, only if F is used, then stress needs to be rotated back
kindly give me any possible feedback
thanks a lot for your time and hoping for your possible help.
Nepolean
Grad Student
Univ of Cincinnati